Within a company, conflict can come in many shapes and sizes. From a squabble over who left their half-eaten sandwich in the shared fridge for three months, to disagreements about managerial styles, an office—virtual or not—can be a breeding ground for disputes. But nowhere is friction more frequent than between a company’s sales force and its credit department.
How often has someone on your sales team celebrated a big win, only to be told the sale won’t go through because there isn’t enough information about the customer to justify extending credit? It’s a classic problem: Sales wants to grow the top line, while credit wants to protect the bottom line. And before you know it, each side feels like the other is trying to sabotage its work.
In my experience, the key to collaborating effectively is for both teams to work towards the same goal: driving sales through improved decision-making.
How often has someone on your sales team celebrated a big win, only to be told the sale won’t go through because there isn’t enough information about the customer to justify extending credit? It’s a classic problem: Sales wants to grow the top line, while credit wants to protect the bottom line. And before you know it, each side feels like the other is trying to sabotage its work.
In my experience, the key to collaborating effectively is for both teams to work towards the same goal: driving sales through improved decision-making.